Publishers Finding Success With Facebook Open Graph Integration

December 2nd, 2011

Facebook reports that publishers using new Open Graph features announced at f8 in September are seeing significant traffic increases, impression growth, and app installs that are reaching new audiences for the publishers. A few data points:

  • More Traffic: 600% increase in traffic coming from Facebook after 10 million people turned on the social news experience at Yahoo! News
  • More users: 1 million users connecting to the social news experience each month at The Independent
  • More impressions: 1 million extra impressions per day from 4 million installs of the Guardian app.
  • New Audiences: 83% of 3.5 million app users are under the age of 35 for the Washington Post

yahoo-news

View the source data on Facebook

Share
Posted in: Product Development
No Comments »

Schools Searching for Social Media Policy Examples

November 18th, 2011

A few people have emailed me seeking examples of social media policies for schools or school districts, but I don’t have any such examples, so I would like to ask readers to help find any folks who have worked through social media policies for schools. If you send me example policies, suggestions or lessons from working through such school policies, I will gladly publish them on this site.
girl-student
Please ask anyone you know who works with schools and policies, so we can find and share the best thinking with the many education professionals who are working through the challenges of social media in their schools.

You can send any suggestions here.

Thank you.
Chris
@cboudreaux

Share
Posted in: Governance, Legal and Regulatory
2 Comments »

Brand Sues Employee for Taking Followers When Leaving

November 14th, 2011

This is why you need a written agreement with each employee who manages any brand social media account: A federal judge ruled last week that news site PhoneDog (@PhoneDog) has a potential case against former employee Noah Kravitz (@NoahKravitz) for taking Twitter followers with him when he left the company. When Kravitz left the company, they asked for the account credentials, but, instead of surrendering the account, he changed the account name. PhoneDog says that Mr. Kravitz owes them $2.50 follower — per month — for each of his 17,000 followers, for a total of $340,000, and the judge required that the company present more evidence.
take

PhoneDog claims that the account and its followers were a company asset because Kravitz acquired the followers as part of his job responsibilities.

According to Eric Goldman, PhoneDog is suing on three fronts: “(1) misappropriation of trade secrets, (2) interference with economic advantage; and (3) conversion.” Eric also examines each of the claims in his blog.

PhoneDog claims that $2.50 is the “industry standard” for the value of a Twitter follower, but no such industry standard exists to my knowledge.

Kravitz argued that the value in a Twitter account really “comes from . . . efforts in posting tweets and [an] individual’s interest in following . . . not from the account itself.”

Regardless of the court decision, all brands should implement written agreements with employees who maintain brand accounts in social media, so this kind of situation never becomes an issue for the courts.

Its not just a problem on Twitter. Google+ requires their newly released brand pages to be created within a personal account. If you have someone creating a brand page on Google+, you better think about what happens if they ever leave the company. I’d start by only letting long-term employees create such accounts.

Share
Posted in: Governance, Team Building
4 Comments »

Are You Ready for College Grads Who Won’t Work Where Social Media Are Banned?

November 8th, 2011

In a speech to summer interns at Microsoft, David Meerman Scott suggested that anyone interested in Marketing or Communications simply decline to work at any company that bans social media use by employees.

Before readers who work in pharma or investments industries get too excited, David sits on our Advisory Board at Converseon, and I know he understands the realities of regulated industries. He worked in the investment business for years. He simply believes that the most talented people coming out of college today can choose to work at companies that let them communicate in the channels where they live and breathe every day: social and mobile.

David also cites a recent study of 3,000 international college students and recent grads, by Cisco, which found that:

  • More than two in five would accept a lower-paying job that had more flexibility with regard to device choice, social media access, and mobility than a higher-paying job with less flexibility.
  • One in three consider the Internet to be as important as air, water, food, and shelter.

You can see David respond to questions from one of the interns here:

Share
Posted in: Governance, Scaling Social Media, Team Building
No Comments »

SEC Launches Web Site for Whistleblowers

November 7th, 2011

In August of this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched a web site for employees to report violations of securities laws, and if a submissions leads to enforcement by the SEC, the submitter can earn 10 – 30 percent of any fraud recovery or monetary sanctions of over $1 million..
whistle-woman
In addition, the SEC will publish a list of 170 enforcement actions taken in the past year, and any whistleblowers involved in those cases can claim their rewards through the site.

Rewards can be substantial. For example: in July 2010, the SEC forced Goldman Sachs to pay $550 million for misleading investors about a subprime mortgage collateralized debt obligation they marketed.

(via Aarti Maharaj at Corporate Secretary magazine)

Share
Posted in: Governance, Legal and Regulatory, Uncategorized
1 Comment »

CASRO Publishes Social Media Research Guidelines

November 2nd, 2011

The leading trade organization for market research professionals — CASRO — published guidelines for anyone conducting market research in social media.
keyhole-eye
The President of CASRO told research magazine that, “These are not mandated standards. We expect these guidelines will evolve based on changes in the social media environment and research industry. As such, comments, additions and edits are welcome and will be given careful consideration by our task force.”

There has been significant debate in the research community regarding the need for guidelines and standards in social media research. In particular, many researchers argue that such research is unethical without express consent of the consumers whose conversations are analysed. Others argue that any publicly available data is OK to use in market research.

Read CASROs guidelines here.


DISCLOSURE
My employer, Converseon, is an active member in CASRO.

Share
Posted in: Governance, Legal and Regulatory
1 Comment »

New Book Outlining How Bad Online Behavior Can Affect Your Life

September 29th, 2011

In a new book entitled lol… OMG! : What Every Student Needs to Know About Reputation Management, Digital Citizenship, and Cyberbullying, Stanford MBA student Matt Ivester explains the dangers of bad online behavior, based on his experience creating and leading a web service entitled JuicyCampus, starting in 2007. The book explains the dangers of bad online behavior, and offers advice to college students who want to enter the adult world with their reputations intact.
OMG_book_cover
In 2007, Ivester founded JuicyCampus.com and invited students at Duke University to gossip freely and anonymously. When he started it, he thought it would be a fun place for college students, but it soon became, “… this malicious website where students were attacked. It got away from me,” he sid in a recent interview with the Stanford Graduate School of Business. “The posts named names, and they were racist, homophobic, misogynistic, vulgar, sexually explicit, deeply personal,” he wrote in the book’s preface.

JuicyCampus.com spread to 500 campuses, attracted investigations from two state attorneys general, spawned hundreds of complaints from college administrators, students, and parents, and even caught the attention of national broadcaster Katie Couric, who described JuicyCampus as a “malicious cesspool of barbs, disses, and insults.” In February 2009 Ivester shut it down.

Out of that experience, he Ivester realized that reputation management and cyber-bullying are big problems on college campuses, and there are not a lot of resources for college students. So, he wrote the book to raise students’ awareness of (1) how their decisions about posting content online will affect how others see them, and (2) how posting decisions by one student will affect the reputations of others.

The book includes carefully chosen anecdotes about videos, PowerPoints, and emails that were meant to be private, but were seen by millions of people.

Previous generations did not have to worry about their college experiments and mistakes living forever for billions to view, Ivester said. But, now, photographs of unflattering behavior, vicious comments on blogs, and even students choices of which pages to “Like” on Facebook could come back to haunt a student twenty years into the future.

“The book is all about personal responsibility,” he says. He starts from the premise that students are creating their online reputations with every piece of content that they post. Most of them enter college with an established digital trail. “Now it’s time for them to take control of that trail and make sure that they are portraying themselves in a positive light,” he says. Campus life offers many temptations and opportunities to experiment. What goes up online will be taken seriously by many people in the outside world. Prospective dates will do a search on their names. Professors, future employers, neighbors, and parents of the friends of their children — the list of possibilities is long.

The book describes ways students can protect their reputations, from carefully managing their privacy settings to constantly monitoring what appears about them online, in addition to a crash course in free speech and tips to help persuade others — either through friendly or litigious means — to remove unflattering content.

Share
Posted in: Governance, Legal and Regulatory
No Comments »

Vanity Metrics v. Actionable Metrics

September 28th, 2011

A lot of marketing and communications teams are simply measuring the wrong things. Instead of focusing on the few metrics that matter to their business, I still see a lot of people counting Fans as their primary success metric, or measuring brand sentiment as a Key Performance Indicator. In my next few posts, I’d like to help explain some of the pitfalls I see in social media performance measurement, and provide some suggestions for folks who want more actionable metrics from their social media marketing programs.
tape-measure
In general, there are two types of metrics: Vanity Metrics, and Actionable Metrics.

Actionable metrics provide real meaning because they help you take actions that improve your business.

Vanity Metrics, on the other hand, sound impressive, but don’t actually help you improve your business. Examples can include:

  • Number of Fans or number of users
  • Web site hits
  • Unique visitors

For most businesses, those metrics simply do not inform rigorous business decisions or strategy. Instead, look at data per customer to understand the actions that will lead to better business outcomes from your social media marketing. Think about metrics such as:

  • Engagement per customer
  • Lifetime value of a customer
  • Cost of acquiring a customer
  • Retention rate, by cohort (customers segmented by the time they joined your service)

Don’t just measure things because they are easy, or because the numbers sound good. Take the effort to choose the handful of metrics that truly matter to your business, then focus on implementing reliable reporting of those metrics across your team for better collective decisions.


Chris Boudreaux leads the Business Integration practice at Converseon, where he manages client services including Performance Scorecards and Social Workforce Enablement.

Share
Posted in: Governance
No Comments »

Twitter Posts to Your Stream When Responding to DMs via SMS

September 26th, 2011

Today, a teammate of mine DMed me on Twitter. I received it as a text message on my iPhone, and did not realize it was a DM through Twitter. When I replied to what I thought was a simple SMS message, Twitter posted it into my public tweet stream.

My colleague saw the public tweet, told me about it, and then I deleted it from Twitter.

Be very careful when replying to text messages. You may inadvertently publicize information that you think you are keeping private.

Share
Posted in: Governance, Product Development
No Comments »

New Analysis of Common Causes for Start-up Failure

September 9th, 2011

Startups that scale properly grow 20 times faster than startups that scaled prematurely, according to research by Blackbox. The findings are part of The Startup Genome Report, an ongoing, collaborative R&D project designed to take a comprehensive dive into what makes Silicon Valley startups successful — and not — and the Startup Genome Compass, a benchmarking tool for startups that helps founders monitor their progress in different growth categories. As of this week, more than 6,000 startups registered to use the Compass.

Blackbox says that the major cause of startup failure is premature scaling, which they define as: when a startup’s core dimensions (product, customer, team, finances and business model) are out of sync. As Blackbox Co-founder Bjoern Herrmann pointed out, “in some cases dysfunctional scaling may be a better description”.

In order to help folks understad the root causes, and how they can be better anticipated, Visual.ly created the graphic below:

why-start-ups-fail

Share
Posted in: Product Development
No Comments »